|
|
Registros recuperados : 39 | |
6. | | PÉREZ GOMAR, E.; GASO, D. Coberturas invernales. ln: Día de campo, Tacuarembó, 12 de octubre, 2010 Adaptabilidad de trigo y cebada en el noreste. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2010. p. 13-14 INIA TacuarembóBiblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
7. | | GASO, D.; CAPURRO, M.C. Potential yield of contrasting soybean maturity groups in Southern Uruguayan conditions: abstract. Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue "Inter-Regional CIGR Conference on Land and Water Challenges, 3., La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. Tools for developing; "Dr. Mario García Petillo"", p. 36, 2015. En versión electrónica difiere la paginación: Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue, p. 39, 2015.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
15. | | GASO, D.; BERGER, A.; POLACK, G.; CIGANDA, V.; OTERO, A. Assimilating leaf area index time series into a simple crop growth model to estimate soil water holding capacity and soybean yield. In: INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL MEETINGS,2013, Tampa, FL, USA. Water, Food, Energy & Innovation for a Sustainable World: Poster no. 804. Florida: ASA/CSSA/SSSA, 2013.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
18. | | BERGER, A.; GASO, D.; CALISTRO, R.; MORALES, X. Limitantes ambientales y potencial de rendimiento de trigo en Uruguay. In: German, S.; Quincke, M.; Vázquez, D.; Castro, M.; Pereyra, S.; Silva, P.; García, A. (Eds.). Seminario Internacional "1914-2014: Un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela". Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2018. p. 112-123. (INIA Serie Técnica; 241).Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
19. | | BERGER, A.G.; GASO, D.; CALISTRO, R.; MORALES, M.X. Limitantes ambientales y potencial de rendimiento de trigo en Uruguay.[Presentación oral]. In: SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL DE TRIGO, 2014, La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. GERMÁN, S., et al. (Org.). 1914-2014, un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela: un valioso legado para el futuro: presentaciones; resúmenes. La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY: INIA, 2014. p. 33.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
20. | | GASO, D.; DE WIT, A.; BERGER, A.; KOOISTRA, L. Predicting within-field soybean yield variability by coupling Sentinel-2 leaf area index with a crop growth model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2021, Volumes 308-309, article 108553. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108553 Article history: Received 15 February 2021, Revised 3 June 2021, Accepted 9 July 2021, Available online 22 July 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license...Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 39 | |
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
31/01/2020 |
Actualizado : |
31/01/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
GASO, D.; BERGER, A.; CIGANDA, V. |
Afiliación : |
DEBORAH VIVIANA GASO MELGAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDRES GUSTAVO BERGER RICCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VERONICA SOLANGE CIGANDA BRASCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Predicting wheat grain yield and spatial variability at field scale using a simple regression or a crop model in conjunction with Landsat images. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, April 2019, Volume 159, Pages 75-83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.02.026 |
ISSN : |
0168-1699 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.compag.2019.02.026 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 8 February 2018 / Revised 22 February 2019 / Accepted 25 February 2019 / Available online 4 March 2019..
This work was supported by ANII fellowship program and INIA fundings. The authors thank farmers who provided field data. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Early prediction of crop yields has been a challenge frequently resolved through the combination of remote sensing data and crop models. The aim of this study was to evaluate two different methods based on remote sensing data for predicting winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield at field scale. We compared the accuracy of: (i) a simple regression method between different vegetation indices at anthesis and grain yield, and (ii) a crop model method based on optimization of two parameters (specific leaf nitrogen and initial aboveground-biomass) using time series of vegetation indices. Vegetation indices were derived from Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images acquired for two growing seasons (2013, 2014) across 22 fields in south western Uruguay with an average size of 128 ha. At all sites, leaf area index (LAI) was measured during a field campaign, and grain yield was measured with yield monitors on harvesters. The simple regression method (SRM) achieved higher accuracy than the model-based method (CMM) for the estimation of yield at field scale (RMSE = 966 kg ha −1 and RMSE = 1532 kg ha −1 , respectively). When deviations between observed and estimated yields were evaluated at pixel (30 × 30 m) level, the model-based method was better at detecting existing spatial variability in grain yield and at identifying areas of different yield potential. Even though both methods have limited utility to estimate yield at field scale with very high accuracy due to large RMSE, the methodologies are suitable to predict harvest volumes at large agricultural areas or at country level, and to construct synthetic yield maps reflecting within field variability. Higher temporal resolution of images would improve accuracy in estimating yield and spatial variability at field scale. © 2019 Elsevier B.V. MenosABSTRACT.
Early prediction of crop yields has been a challenge frequently resolved through the combination of remote sensing data and crop models. The aim of this study was to evaluate two different methods based on remote sensing data for predicting winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield at field scale. We compared the accuracy of: (i) a simple regression method between different vegetation indices at anthesis and grain yield, and (ii) a crop model method based on optimization of two parameters (specific leaf nitrogen and initial aboveground-biomass) using time series of vegetation indices. Vegetation indices were derived from Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images acquired for two growing seasons (2013, 2014) across 22 fields in south western Uruguay with an average size of 128 ha. At all sites, leaf area index (LAI) was measured during a field campaign, and grain yield was measured with yield monitors on harvesters. The simple regression method (SRM) achieved higher accuracy than the model-based method (CMM) for the estimation of yield at field scale (RMSE = 966 kg ha −1 and RMSE = 1532 kg ha −1 , respectively). When deviations between observed and estimated yields were evaluated at pixel (30 × 30 m) level, the model-based method was better at detecting existing spatial variability in grain yield and at identifying areas of different yield potential. Even though both methods have limited utility to ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Crop growth model; Landsat; Leaf area index; Wheat; Yield. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
Marc : |
LEADER 02944naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1060735 005 2020-01-31 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0168-1699 024 7 $a10.1016/j.compag.2019.02.026$2DOI 100 1 $aGASO, D. 245 $aPredicting wheat grain yield and spatial variability at field scale using a simple regression or a crop model in conjunction with Landsat images.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 500 $aArticle history: Received 8 February 2018 / Revised 22 February 2019 / Accepted 25 February 2019 / Available online 4 March 2019.. This work was supported by ANII fellowship program and INIA fundings. The authors thank farmers who provided field data. 520 $aABSTRACT. Early prediction of crop yields has been a challenge frequently resolved through the combination of remote sensing data and crop models. The aim of this study was to evaluate two different methods based on remote sensing data for predicting winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield at field scale. We compared the accuracy of: (i) a simple regression method between different vegetation indices at anthesis and grain yield, and (ii) a crop model method based on optimization of two parameters (specific leaf nitrogen and initial aboveground-biomass) using time series of vegetation indices. Vegetation indices were derived from Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images acquired for two growing seasons (2013, 2014) across 22 fields in south western Uruguay with an average size of 128 ha. At all sites, leaf area index (LAI) was measured during a field campaign, and grain yield was measured with yield monitors on harvesters. The simple regression method (SRM) achieved higher accuracy than the model-based method (CMM) for the estimation of yield at field scale (RMSE = 966 kg ha −1 and RMSE = 1532 kg ha −1 , respectively). When deviations between observed and estimated yields were evaluated at pixel (30 × 30 m) level, the model-based method was better at detecting existing spatial variability in grain yield and at identifying areas of different yield potential. Even though both methods have limited utility to estimate yield at field scale with very high accuracy due to large RMSE, the methodologies are suitable to predict harvest volumes at large agricultural areas or at country level, and to construct synthetic yield maps reflecting within field variability. Higher temporal resolution of images would improve accuracy in estimating yield and spatial variability at field scale. © 2019 Elsevier B.V. 653 $aCrop growth model 653 $aLandsat 653 $aLeaf area index 653 $aWheat 653 $aYield 700 1 $aBERGER, A. 700 1 $aCIGANDA, V. 773 $tComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, April 2019, Volume 159, Pages 75-83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.02.026
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|